メインコンテンツにスキップ
Trial LessonWith Counseling

IELTS Academic Writing: A Complete Guide to the Scoring Criteria to Break the Band 6.5 Barrier

Published:
2026 Latest
IELTS Writing 採点基準完全解説|Band 6.5の壁を超える(Academic) - ELT英会話 英語学習コラム
Tatsuya Tanaka

Author: Tatsuya Tanaka|Representative Director, ELT Japan

Intermediate to advanced learners aiming for an Overall Band 6.5 or 7.0 in IELTS Academic Writing often face the "Band 6.0–6.5 plateau."

To overcome this plateau, simply writing what feels like a good essay is not enough. You must have a clear understanding of the four official scoring criteria (Band Descriptors) and refine your writing to align with what examiners look for to award a Band 7.

This article breaks down the key differences between Band 6.0 and 7.0 based on the official criteria and provides concrete strategies for improving your score.

What You'll Learn in This Article

  • The Four Assessment Criteria: A detailed look at Task Achievement/Response, Coherence & Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range & Accuracy.
  • The Nature of the 6.5 Plateau: Understanding the "some parts are Band 7, but others are stuck at Band 6" situation.
  • The Fastest Path to Band 7: Specific, actionable steps for each assessment criterion.
  • Checklists: High-score template elements for both Task 1 and Task 2.

1. The Official IELTS Writing Scoring Criteria: Assessment Across Four Areas

IELTS Writing, for both Task 1 (summary) and Task 2 (essay), is assessed based on the following four criteria. Each criterion is weighted equally (25%).

Table 1: The Four Writing Assessment Criteria (Academic)

Criterion

Task 1 (Academic)

Task 2 (Academic)

Key Assessment Points (Summary)

① Task Achievement / Response

Task Achievement

Task Response

Have all parts of the question been addressed? Is the position clear?

② Coherence & Cohesion

Coherence & Cohesion

Coherence & Cohesion

Is the paragraphing, logical flow, and use of cohesive devices natural?

③ Lexical Resource

Lexical Resource

Lexical Resource

Appropriate vocabulary choice, paraphrasing, and collocations.

④ Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Variety and accuracy of complex sentences (few errors).

Source: IELTS official "IELTS Writing key assessment criteria"

Important: The scoring criteria are publicly available as the Public Band Descriptors. Reading them carefully is the first step in your preparation.

2. Key Basics: Roles and Time Management for Task 1 & Task 2

  • Task 1 (Approx. 20 mins / 150+ words): Objectively summarize and report visual information such as charts, graphs, or maps. Do not include your opinion.
  • Task 2 (Approx. 40 mins / 250+ words): An essay where you present your opinion or discuss a given topic. This task is worth twice as much as Task 1, so poor time management can be critical.

3. The Difference Between Band 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 (Interpreting the Official Criteria)

There is no official definition for "Band 6.5." In practice, it means that some of the four criteria are at a Band 7 level, while the others remain at a Band 6 level.

This means you don't need to be perfect in every area. By identifying and improving the "Band 6 elements" that are holding you back, you can raise your overall score.

Table 2: The Key Differences Between Band 6.0 vs. Band 7.0

Criterion

Band 6.0 (What's Lacking)

Band 7.0 (The Goal)

Task Response

Addresses all parts of the prompt, but some arguments are underdeveloped or the conclusion is unclear.

Presents a clear and consistent position. Main ideas are presented, developed, and supported with evidence.

Coherence

Use of cohesive devices is mechanical or unnatural.

Each paragraph has a clear central topic. The logical progression is smooth and natural.

Lexical

Vocabulary is adequate, but there are noticeable unnatural choices or errors.

Flexible and precise. Unnatural choices are rare. Focus is on collocations rather than "difficult words."

Grammar

Uses complex sentences, but with some grammatical errors. Meaning is generally clear.

Frequent error-free sentences. Complex structures are used accurately.

Source: IELTS official Public Band Descriptors 2

4. Criterion-by-Criterion: Action Plan to Break the Band 6.5 Barrier

Here, we outline the highest-priority actions for test-takers stuck at Band 6.5 to reach Band 7.

4-1. Task Response / Achievement (The Most Critical Area)

This is often the reason why many test-takers feel they "wrote well in English" but still receive a low score.

  • Band 7 Requirement: "Address all parts of the prompt" and "maintain a clear position throughout the response."
  • Action Plan:
    • Deconstruct the prompt: If the question is "Discuss both views and give your opinion," ensure you dedicate separate paragraphs to "View A," "View B," and "My Opinion."
    • State your position in the introduction: Don't save your conclusion for the end. Write a clear thesis statement in your introduction.

4-2. Coherence & Cohesion (Structure and Flow)

  • Band 7 Requirement: "Each paragraph has a clear central topic" and "logical progression."
  • Action Plan:
    • One paragraph, one idea: Dedicate each body paragraph to a single main idea. Don't cram multiple points into one.
    • Use cohesive devices selectively: Avoid mechanically using words like Furthermore or Moreover. Use them only where a logical connection (e.g., contrast, cause-and-effect) is truly needed.

4-3. Lexical Resource (Vocabulary)

  • Band 7 Requirement: "Flexible and precise vocabulary" and "awareness of style and collocation."
  • Action Plan:
    • Prioritize collocations: Instead of memorizing isolated "big words," focus on using natural word combinations (e.g., heavy rain ✓, not strong rain ✗).
    • Paraphrase effectively: Avoid repeating the same words (especially common ones like problem, good, bad). Use synonyms that fit the context.

4-4. Grammatical Range & Accuracy (Grammar)

  • Band 7 Requirement: "Frequent error-free sentences."
  • Action Plan:
    • Eliminate basic errors: It is better to eliminate fundamental mistakes (e.g., subject-verb agreement, articles, tenses) than to attempt complex structures and make errors.
    • Save time for proofreading: Taking the last 5 minutes to correct careless mistakes can potentially raise your score by 0.5.

5. Task-Specific Checklists for a High-Scoring Structure

We've created a checklist of key points that both AI scoring systems and human examiners focus on. Use it for self-correction during your practice sessions.

5-1. Task 1 (Academic) Checklist

  • Did you include an Overview (a summary of the main trends)? (Missing this risks a score of Band 5 or lower)

  • Did you make comparisons and contrasts instead of just listing data points?
  • Did you avoid including personal opinions or speculation? (Stick to an objective report.)
  • Did you use the correct tense (e.g., past tense for past data)?

5-2. Task 2 (Academic) Checklist

  • Have you addressed all parts of the task?
  • Did you clearly state your position in the introduction?
  • Do your body paragraphs follow a "Topic Sentence → Reason → Example" structure?
  • Are your examples based on your own knowledge or experience, rather than "fictional research"?

Frequently Asked Questions

The core criteria (vocabulary, grammar, organization) are the same, but the first criterion is different. Task 1 is assessed on 'Task Achievement' (summarizing and reporting information), while Task 2 is assessed on 'Task Response' (developing and discussing an opinion).

The two key areas are 'Task Response' (fully addressing the prompt) and 'Grammatical Accuracy' (writing error-free sentences). In particular, avoiding misinterpreting the question and reducing careless mistakes will help stabilize your score.

No, using difficult words unnaturally can actually lower your score (a characteristic of a Band 6 performance). What's required for Band 7 is 'natural and topic-appropriate vocabulary (collocations)' and 'accuracy'.

We do not recommend it. Official IELTS and IDP guidelines recommend using specific examples from your own knowledge and experience rather than unverifiable data. The logical persuasiveness of your argument is what's important.

About the Author

Tatsuya Tanaka

Tatsuya Tanaka

Representative Director, ELT Japan

After graduating from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, he pursued graduate studies at the same university, focusing on research in computational fluid dynamics. During his graduate studies, he worked as a visiting researcher at Rice University in Houston, USA, where he was involved in fluid simulations for spacecraft. After returning to Japan, while continuing his research, he also organized career fairs at Harvard University and Imperial College London. In 2019, while still a student, he established Sekijin LLC (now ELT Education Inc.). In 2020, he partnered with the UK-based company ELT School of English Ltd. to launch an online English conversation business for the Japanese market. Since its founding, he has provided counseling to over 1,000 English language learners.

LinkedIn